>> Evening thank you for joining us for those of you in
the audience who have not attended one of these hearings
recently allowed me to review our normal procedure.
When each item comes up staff introduce each item for
consideration, if you are not the applicant then you would
like to speak in support or against the item please fill
out one of the forms around the lobby indicate whether you're
for or against it right the item number on it. Once you
have filled it out if you could please give it to the clerk to
my left there please
the applicants and then the applicant supporters will be
heard first
81 in a position will be heard next and the applicant has an
opportunity for rebuttal. Should it should be applicable
to wish.
Comments should be restricted to just the pertinent
information regarding the agenda item under discussion we
don't get into personal disputes or neighborhood spats
or anything like that.
If you're an individual you have 3 minutes to speak.
If you represent a group you will have 6 minutes to speak.
And as we start moving down the agenda if you can kind of start
moving closer to the to the microphone just so we can move
along a efficiently
when it is your turn to speak please identify yourself
clearly by name and by stating your address.
Each speaker should be given respectful and courteous
attention
and be aware that the board may ask questions of anybody who
comes before us
information that you share. Pictures site plans letters
anything like that will stay with the clerk is part of the
record anything you share that might be on a digital device.
We'll need you to share a copy of that with us that needs to
go in the record as well.
Once all of that has happened. Last the board for a motion.
What the motion has been made and seconded discussion will be
closed to the floor.
Following board discussion of will be taken.
During voting board members who do not cast objecting vote to
consider 2 voted in support of the motion.
A person who's aggrieved by the decision of this board may
within 15 days, file an appeal to the Board of County
commissioners and our staff can help you with that process
having said that let's begin number one.
>> Good evening for the record into Gates with development
services planning and development item number one is
a request for a lot size variance from one acre to
36,000 square feet for single-family dwelling in a one
agricultural district located on lot 16 D on Mary drive.
This is a legal parcel record that was created prior to this
to Seminole County subdivision regulations being adopted the
future single-family dwelling will be approximately 2400
square feet and will meet all of the minimum one's own a
setback requirements.
They have not been any prior variances for the subject
property and this concludes my presentation.
>> Thank you and gentlemen any questions for staff
seeing none as applicant here. Yes come on up.
West 8 only if you want to get the look at what staff said no.
>> There there's a house next to the law which is the
previous lot owner that we purchased from and she has a
house on the same exact size lot I believe that these were
one acre parcels until lot J got implemented a few years
back for permanent right of way easement to the other parcels
in that area so it is basically an acre.
Any questions gentleman.
>> Mister chair if she is speaking and to get the name
and her ashes.
>> Thank you for providing us your name and address please
Shannon that yeah, 1, 3, 2, but court Casselberry Florida
it pushed.
Thank you
is enough.
Anyone in the audience to speak in support of the application.
Anyone in the audience speak in opposition,
seeing none your pleasure double move to approve the
motion to approve their second second from the judge all those
in favor aye post
passes to enjoy it.
>> Number to item number 2 is a request for rear yard setback
there and from 30 feet to 21 half feet for a garage addition
R one a single family dwelling district
located at one 10 Cherry Hill circle.
In the Brantley ha states subdivision the proposed garage
edition will be 792 square feet will encroach 9 and a half feet
into the required rear yard setback the Brantley Harbor
homeowners Association approved the proposed garage edition.
2 letters of support were submitted by that one was
submitted by the directly affected neighbor to the West
and the neighbor directly to the east.
I'm not been any prior variances for the subject
property. This concludes my presentation.
Thank you is the applicant here
is there anything you look at what staff said.
>> We'll have any questions for the applicant.
Anyone in the audience speak in support of this
is anyone in the audience to speak in opposition.
Seeing none.
Mister chair Sir move to approve a motion to approve is
there a second second that motion and a second all those
in favor aye opposed.
It passes.
We enjoy it.
>> Item number 3 is a request for rear yard setback variance
from 30 feet to 21 and a half feet from addition R one
single-family dwelling district located at 3.91 with can drive
in the lake Harney Manor subdivision
the existing residents was built in 1973 and has a legal
nonconforming structure, the proposed to story edition will
be approximately 670 square feet and will encroach 8 and a
half feet to the required rear yard setback.
The first floor part of the addition will be an open car
port.
The second floor of the additional will be comprised of
this the space that the owners lost during hurricane Ian
essentially converting the portion of the home and to
still home to prevent future flooding.
They're not been any prior variances for the subject
property and this concludes my presentation.
>> Thank you Gentlemen, any questions for staff.
It's a challenge there.
So I guess you know staff found
for for denial right. But this is in conjunction with the
Seminole County emergency management for mitigation
right.
I don't know.
I can't answer that
we can actually have there
any other questions for staff.
Certainly the applicant is going to give us your name and
address please.
>> Jesse during that 3, 1, would come from the owner of
the property here with my wife Jane and their own. We just to
add some flavor actress and photos of the flooding issues
as well as
a sample of the floor plan and insight playing of the mission
were not looking to really net adding the square footage to
our home. We.
>> When the suffered from a pretty severe loss.
>> Crossing the 45 foot in our home for 3 months and
legislation to resiliency to our home have a safe spot for.
>> And it says are you guys went through that any questions
to answer your question so.
>> Coming before this board you've already worked for
Seminole County emergency management I still got grant
money for the mitigation on this things like that. So this
is
this is really just the permit to get the final process
moving.
>> Yes, and it's been approved currently about Seminole
County. It's with the state along with the rest of the
hurricane losses and is in the process a chance for
>> okay that's up from the property. Well haha yeah,
there's the county folks discussion lacked yes in any
other questions for the applicant.
Thank you Sir, thank you to you in here to speak in support.
Yes or come and
if you give us your name and address please Sir.
But also my 3.85 would come drive.
>> And the property owner immediately South 3.91 terms of
my neighbors.
I lived in Geneva for 4 years and
I had the pleasure of living next to the terms. I think just
there's 2 pieces though I want to address here and the first
as a practical consideration. The additions or the approval
of the setback. They're requesting the variance that is
their construction work and I have a they will not impede
live, you are enjoying my waterfront. I believe that
there to be immediate North the lot is basically abandoned.
But I think that to be more qualitative consideration that
would like to speak to is that.
Jamie and just you have been
really exemplary neighbors. I think they've been great
citizens of Seminole County.
When the hurricane hit us. It was
really difficult to deal with we're kayak through a half mile
of water to see if their homes trying to protect them.
It was a historic flood and yet in spite of all that you know
they have invested a lot of of money into their property.
But you talk they talk about that first floor that had been
remodeled. I saw them toiling for 2 years like that is
livable space for the garage, they convert into a living
space in there and basically in their basement that was
completely wiped out I think you saw those photos House
about 3 feet of water right over you know right up to their
kitchen manatee are there about the manatee and this variant so
they're asking for is
you know that every investment into their property into
Seminole County and I would sure love for them to continue
to be a neighbors.
Thank you for any questions this gentleman.
Thank you Sir, and you know speak in support.
Any one of the audience to speak in opposition,
seeing none because you know.
>> We have to prove we should proves or second because we had
a second all those in favor aye opposed.
Best of luck the rest of us stay dry.
>> Next please, sorry item number 4 is a request for one
the rear yard setback variance from 10 feet to 7 feet and to a
side yard nor setback variance from 7 and a half feet to 4 and
a half feet for 7 R one single-family dwelling district
located at 5118 Cyprus court and the redwood Heights
subdivision the proposed shed will be 100 square feet and
will encroach 3 feet to the required rear yard setback and
3 feet into the required side yard or setback.
There have not been any prior variances or building comments
found for the premier shed in this concludes my presentation.
>> And gentlemen any questions for staff.
Jeff lykins you
as you can look at what Stephen said Sir.
Do you have any questions for the applicant.
The question if you could come to us are.
Just to give us your name and address please and
when they surface Cortlandt Park Florida. OK, there's some
discussion.
>> Bought the tree roots and so forth.
You're not planning on putting the shed by the tree that
correct.
>> Correct yeah, the reason that was brought up was as to
why we're gonna put it it is really the only spot for it to
go because in the opposite corner,
there's a large tree that will prevent me from.
>> Putting so it's it's it's the other into a lot worse so
just yard.
>> Typically there's 3 different well 2 different
large trees.
So had been showing pictures of thing. I think there's a
picture
with some.
So the word correct and it brings as that's the proposed
location, correct.
>> So when you're with us if you check with your neighbors
about this.
No I haven't
and the questions.
I thank you Sir.
Anyone here to speak in support.
And you hear speak in opposition.
Seeing none gentleman.
What improvements second those in favor aye aye it passes
enjoy it.
Yes please.
>> Good evening for the record Hillary Payton planning and
development item number 5 is to variance request for 1200 North
Street located in the sanlando springs subdivision
the request is for any sides side Street setback variance
from 25 feet to 7.8 feet at a North side yard setback
variance from 10 feet to 6 feet 9.5 inches for a shed in R one
double is zoning district.
The subject property is a corner lot has 2 front yards
for setback purposes, the front of the House faces North Street
the Marlette Avenue side is where the variance is being
sought.
The request is to construct a 16 by 16 shed 17.2 feet into
the East Side she set back in approximately 3.2 feet into the
north side yard setback letter support has been received from
the directly affected neighbor. This concludes my presentation
of open questions.
>> Gentlemen, you have any questions for staff.
I love when the state in a short.
This this shows. They're they're proposing to build
within the existing fence, correct.
Do we have any do we know whether or not that fits was
lawfully record. Yes, they have a variance that they received
in 2003 for that that's gotcha perfect thank you in the
applicant here.
We did add anything Stephens said
given question servant for the effort.
It was in the audience to speak in support.
Anyone in the audience to speak in opposition.
Seeing none.
We have to prove
motion to approve a second all those in favor.
I those opposed.
All right there you go you have you should this man you got to
have a shunt haha.
>> What's next item number 6 is to variance requests for lot
one on tangerine Avenue located in the pie level subdivision
the request is for both side yard setback production from 7
and a half feet to 5 feet for single-family dwelling in the R
one zoning district.
The request is to construct a single-family dwelling or no
larger than 29.9 7 people I I 45 feet deep 2 and a half feet
into the North and south side artifacts this concludes my
presentation of the pretty fish.
>> Now is this do we know is this illegal parcel of record
for it is part of the LDC who think any questions for staff.
Yes, Sir,
so because as you said it was a.
We'll watch a live record. So there is no. It didn't meet
the requirements for minimum lot size for single-family
development doesn't apply in this case.
Only percent but for right and what about is there an
administrative waiver required for a minute and welling size
because the proposed House, they mean put on here is.
>> They would be required to meet the minimum houses,
okay, I don't think they meet that based on the plan to
submit it.
If it's too story.
Is a 2 story, I'm not sure okay, I guess that's that
issues of the forest.
Yeah, that would be reviewed the time building permitting
okay.
>> We are just say if its OK to go then we go if not then
everything else to us phone place for them.
Any other questions for staff.
The applicant here
to just share with us or anything
got any questions for the applicant.
It's really missed it as you can ask a question you want to.
Well if it's for our consideration, move and every
desk. All right anyone here to speak to think
and support of this application.
Anyone here to speak in opposition,
seeing none your pleasure
actually I have one question, I'm sorry for the staff
percent.
>> So the Northside parcel
I was actually on the MLS earlier and I it didn't show
who owns that I assume it's like a Seminole County
conservation that then goes on the East side of the property.
I was totally great out I couldn't quick to me that that
kind of let a lot the one just north of the parcel, we're
looking at on the screen. And then it kind of looks like
it goes down the line and then behind the property and all the
way down almost like a Swale for runoff
does that owned by the county.
>> I believe that property is in the city of Sanford, okay.
I'm not I'm not sure I didn't look behind us.
>> Yeah, my my only concern I guess is that by allowing a 5
foot
property there and I think it becomes incredibly difficult to
build, but again it was great out of Miami last I really
don't know
who owns that or if it's even subject to be built can
probably look it up.
>> It is located in.
Yeah weakness about this property is is actually zoned
commercial zoning.
>> Interesting you that is unique on the road.
>> Probably historical that's been there for quite a while.
Yeah, I know that the rest of the houses to the north that
you can see in that photo, I know those are his own
commercial.
Is it your question.
>> Yeah, yeah, I I guess my my the question then becomes,
is it part of our concern for this matter.
Effectively that that property that are would we be stripping
the property from the north building rights by allowing
this setback because in those 2.
Still to be incredibly close with a 5, 5, foot setback,
I mean,
so it makes sense liked.
I don't know if that's even a subject for this board baha
this.
>> We want to require that parcel would be coming to the
U.S. condition with that setback right so they might be
in for.
>> If I could just interject place of work or deputy County
attorney for the record the building code has required
separation of structures for fire safety purposes. Don't
call me I think it's like 3 feet or something like that,
but I mean if
this is because its first in time so this applicants coming
in 5 feet away if another applicant would come in they
would have to deal with you know it would take into
consideration, this applicant structure that's on their
property be looked at that time, but
you know 5 feet in urban more urban settings are on small
lots is not an unusual side setback, but I don't think
there's any concern the concern that you raise that I don't
think we'll be concerned in the future. But the next person
that comes and based on the building code separation
requirements, so that just to kind of clarify that even if
there was a concern because they were here first as really
relevant right beautiful, okay.
>> I think that I mean isn't that that's why we we post a
notice these things that yeah, the party they can come before
us say something this then I'm good enough questions. First
is the applicant here.
We want to go through the you didn't win anything that's
right.
Having said that though does anybody need to have any
questions for the applicant.
Anyone here to speak in support.
Anyone here to speak in opposition.
Well there we go.
What a pleasure to move to approve a motion to approve the
the second second we have a second those in favor, aye.
It's approved.
Next.
>> Item number 7 is a variance request for 500 West face
tariffs located in the open sure subdivision the request is
for an East Side. She setback reduction from 25 feet to 0 fee
for privacy fence in the RP zoning district the subject
property is a corner lot in his 2 front yards for setback
purposes, the front of the House faces West 5th terrace to
Maitland Avenue side is where the variance is being sought
the request is to bring into compliance a 6 foot privacy
fence entirely within the side streets fact, the privacy fence
is 11 feet from the sidewalk in 19 feet from the edge of
pavement traffic engineer is no objection to the placement of
the fence is a really say visibility a code enforcement
violation number 24 dash 3, 9, was issued for the structure
resulting in the necessity of this variance 4 letters of
support were received from neighbors in the community,
this concludes my presentation built for questions.
>> Any questions for staff.
I have heard of it, but I think that
notice that they were given
code enforcement defense is already in place. Yes.
>> In the state to do the applicant is telling us that
the fence was installed by the prior owner do we know for sure
when that fence was erected.
>> It was my understanding that there was one their prior that
and then they rip least that was my understanding that you
can clarify that with her.
The applicant here.
>> He's come on a good thing the organist
we were chatting about that before the meeting.
You could please give us your name and address for the
record.
>> It gets
OK, my name is Cody, yes, I and they'll notify have been with
fake there for us. I have been they our NATO the property for
almost a year to 50 they later to by February.
That than me know that I was in violation that defense was
in violation. The fence was place by we've used there by
2020 or the laters was chill with me pictures where you can
see that these by global you know that the trust that the CD
Sen.
The show when they before the half after the previous owner,
the or different patients. The property. About the
property June 2021 or so, by Donald were
I get is I the application to remove the the A's that are in
from they got that much to provide and the old security
the to myself, I'm a single woman tell you that on that
property so I was feeling highly Dole. You know.
I'm also hearing that property because he sent corner unit.
So I wanted to put the fence that somebody say it's been
like that because the trees are going to grow
and you are going to have enough security team that means
that in front of the good that we should arrive now are they
grow I I may be a strong and beat so I don't need I sense
anymore so then DS after I've received letters from this CD
requesting me, you know to be on plays with the violations so
I came.
They asked her to speak with the ladies in the from about
that so I'm on the fence.
The 2 feet
and into this because I really bad then that the UK should I
it was my mistake, so I contact somebody I move the fans.
Somebody say is not the fees and its 25 feet.
I was actually to be 92.
This concern with myself and have like yeah, I'm going to
last how full flight pod you so my property is proceed and
shower.
One. That means that these profession at all fees us well,
but they have my Homestead I you sink deeper bit of the S N
was he then showed property my actually my neighbors where
they be happy because the House was destroyed in the past he
was you see in the U.S. is storage.
Now as somebody beauty for property, those trees are from
the CD on our in front of the fans that are the program right
now. Defense history move, I'm going to lose my privacy and
going to loose my security the
and it's going to be us those for everybody who grows by
basically everybody's going to have access to my property.
Also is the only property in Macon Avenue that these
residents show my neighbor, him decisive some property
management. I mean they owe their size is send all your
fees so.
Yeah, this is my city basically what is going on at home.
>> Thank you ma'am, but yeah, it is much for having me any
questions for the applicant.
Thank you for your time
is anyone here to speak in support of this application.
Anyone here to speak in opposition.
A pleasure Gentlemen.
Mister chair Sir to approve the motion to approve a second.
You want to just need to discuss this video on what to
the vote saying this is a little bit funky
and I would like to vote those in favor aye opposed.
All right passes.
What is next.
>> Item number 8 is a variance request for one to 6 fairway
drive located in the tea and green estates subdivision the
request is for a front yard setback reduction from 25 feet
to 17.8 p for from Port edition and the r-one zoning districts,
the request is to construct a 10 foot by 16 foot screened-in
front porch in addition, 7.2 feet into the front yard
setback. It is a known there was a some porch there and it's
unknown when that was constructed house was
constructed in 1960. I'm not sure if it was original to the
House or flat but it was 17 point.
8 feet from the front property line.
This concludes my presentation, the questions.
>> Thank you him gentleman any questions for staff.
One is the applicant here could you come on down Sir.
I've got a question the others might put you give us your name
and address please 1, 0, 6, fairway drive we toss we thank
you Sir is before we ask you questions is there.
Is there anything you'd like to add to what staff that's it.
>> I bought the House in 2020 is don't 1960 it had the front
porch on it.
The hurricane's sustained some damage so I took it down
because it's unsafe and
want to bring it back up to code and realized if I feel
that way was it was
include encroaching on the setback.
So wanted to
see if I can put it back where it was if not you know, it's
with us fish order.
A gentleman, the questions. My question was just answered
it.
>> I knew I knew
look I'm just asking is based on all, I know is we're still
looking at the photos.
Are you just in closing the existing concrete pad, that's
there.
You know that.
>> The original House had like a 3 foot overhang at the front
entry. And whoever lived there for do it yourself or bills
onto an extended it out.
And they poured concrete is only it should have said so
I want to keep the same footprint get rid of that for
proper Foundation for that just put a covered porch for now
maybe screening of the future.
Thank you Sir of any other questions.
>> Has made it to me. I thought so and then the joins
that you are heading out to the House itself.
You just you're just going put.
Roof over the current pad.
>> With a new Foundation, yes Sir, get rid of the that's
there now because it's not structure. At the House and
just keep it know just keep it on the same, but friends what
it was.
Any other questions.
All right, thanks or if anyone here speak in support.
We do have some weight.
You could share with us your name and address first please.
>> My name is Michael rice and event well one 12 fairly drive
to north of Mister Thomas.
I reside there for approximately 1112 years.
I've seen probably 3 families who then and now that and
there.
The porch was there would be for her to be moving into my
home.
I know many of the people that live in the hole horseshoe
shape development there that actually he's have a good
friend that actually on the second house built in that
neighborhood.
And majority the House that porches on him when they were
built.
They said this month in but it was shortly thereafter, I'm
probably in the early 70's at that port was built on there.
I this isn't Mister Thomas's once and saw that that porch
was
was a life safety issue and that's why he returned he
removed that porch.
So I'd like to see him came that porch back on the
property.
>> Thank you for sharing that gentleman. You have any
questions for.
This gentleman was here. Thank you Sir for your time,
anyone else here to speak in support.
So when you speak in opposition,
seeing none, you're pleasure to move to approve the Senate.
Second those in favor. I proposed
it's approved.
Thank you all for your time last item.
>> Item number 9 is a variance request for one oh one North
someone drive located in the somewhat estates subdivision
the request is for a front yard setback reduction from 25 feet
to 20 and a half feet for an addition and there are one
zoning district the subject property is a corner lot has to
for Harris for setback purposes, the front of the
House faces someone drive the Cherokee circle side is where
the variance is being sought.
The request is to build an addition and convert an
existing carport into a 648 square-foot master bedroom and
bathroom, 4 and a half feet into the front yard setback to
letters of support have been received from the adjacent
property owners with a presentation will pretty
questions
any questions for staff.
>> Post on the site plan.
We're only hearing. I'm not the dimension that says 20 they say
20.9 9 or says 20.5.
Again, it's
not for particular to the front lines so again I was asked the
question how they can tell you measure
is it not the extension of the building.
>> To the problems from the closest point to
the building to the closest a property line.
Based on what direction
closes lines going to be perpendicular.
>> With only 1, 9, is not showing perpendicular 100 over
the fence you came from.
>> That's the measurement that was provided so.
Well with that.
Well any other questions
and they do the following year.
We know from.
At the moment trying to figure that out. I was wondering if
someone wanted to ask about that measure that is the
applicant here.
>> We can answer that question if you could share with us your
name and address please is Republic house he my address is
2 to 6, 7, Lakeview drive Sanford, Florida, 3, 2, 7,
7, 3,
Raise a really good question. The architects are the ones
that actually did that the mansion and it is it is
supposed to be measured perpendicular to though the
property line and
I think that
that is the dimension
from perpendicular right at that corner.
>> I don't I don't. Yeah, it's goes like that and just throw
me because it's a 20.9 were using a 20.5 may. I know 4
tenths of an inch, but there are 40 foot. I'm just trying to
be right where that.
>> Well if that number that's what was on the application.
So it's not going to make a break any time soon I want to
ask questions
ending a to ensure the safety ser just appreciate and
approval.
Any any any other questions for the applicant.
Mister Clinton you think not exactly a question for the
applicant, but I do have a concern that.
>> The applicant did say that according to his architect that
20.9 foot distance is supposed to be perpendicular to the
property line, but
he just said
he wasn't sure my concern is that if we approve the 20.5
feet.
It's not a 100% clear that that 20.9 feet is perpendicular to
the property line.
I want to prove the distance that's going to be
insufficient. 4
for the structure that's going to be on the property.
I'm wondering if we shouldn't continue this next month.
So the applicant's architects can have the opportunity to
revise the site plan or poor.
So we can be certain that they were going to approve today is
what's going to support the structure.
>> You can see on the site plan, I'm sorry to interrupt,
you know places you can see on the site plan that they drew a
line where the setback line is where the 25 feet is you see
that dotted line you know with pages and it's on the site
plan.
Page one 88.
>> Well times looking at it, let me ask a questionable Lou
back to this
just to staff have any discretion.
You know to look at and has built and see something is kind
of a de minimis and approve it.
>> Not if it's beyond what is approved for the variance so if
the variant was approved to 20 and a happy which together
assuming is why the applicant requested 20 happen is that
instead of 20.9 to give them a couple inches if it's more than
that the staff cannot approve that they would have to come
back for the variance
but if you look at the drawing like I was saying on the site
plan and you can see that it minimally there's only a tiny
corner of it that encroaches into that front 25 foot
setback.
>> I might be able to help you with this if it's the setback
is 20.5 feet from the front yard.
That is closer to the street.
Than the 20.9 that's to mention.
So the building would have footprint would have to grow to
get to 20.5.
>> Engineers the vixens.
>> Or if I may my name is that into your skin and project
coordinator to the residential permit review far all of these
projects that come in so usually, I'm the person to
advising. Our lovely applicants they need a variance in the
first place when ad coming to say usually they've submitted a
building permit and I see there's a discrepancy I will
tell because we've had a couple of situations arise where
they've gotten a variance and they're off by inches because
of a former board that's off on a foundation. So I will
typically advise our applicants to give themselves a little bit
of a grace. So it says 20.9 on their site plan. I will advise
him to ask for a few extra inches and go for the 20.5 so
that when they go for their final inspection that if
they're contractors off by a few inches when they're forming
that Foundation. They don't fail
because things happen in the field and I would hate for
applicants to have to come back in for another variance because
their contractor was off and ensure and enhance their and it
failed our applicants in the field, not because of anything
they did or anything or engineers did on their site
plan but because of accidents in the field. So I typically if
they're all you know on a whole for half a year. I will talk
tend to tell them to ask for just a slight bit more on the
inches.
Just to give themselves a cushion to they don't feel on
the final inspection because we have had it happen.
>> And then honestly is what I was concerned about it.
But it sounds like well, let's let's get to what you need to
finish of the.
>> The public input part of the week ahead for the discussion
tonight, Mike yeah, what what the tattoo that 20.5 feet.
We have that cushion from what
the building to mention is shown on the drawing.
Okay, there's 4 tenths of a foot.
The difference the building it what's to mentioned on the plan
is for tense of a foot
into the lot.
And we're asking we're not asking for 20.9 feet were
asking for 20.5 feet to the setback line.
The question.
>> Yeah, just while we still hear on that site plan there's
a dimension that looks like it is coming from the corner of
the driveway.
That the residents, 23.6 wasn't what set to mention too.
>> The existing carport, excuse me.
>> So the existing residents already encroaching son Pierce
o
we should be doing with that too.
>> No considering this house was constructed a long time
ago.
Just ask the question. But I mean the entire structure is
part of
the requests,
including that carport because they're converting the carport
as well.
>> We could all make sure that that wasn't
you know being closed and also is an incorrect.
>> That's all it is being in close as part of the addition.
>> So this is already in place.
>> I guess the proposed to make it in encroaches more.
So is that why.
>> Well the with the excuse me Mason worker for the record the
request is for the addition.
The addition area showed and
proposed bedroom aligned area. And that includes the route are
part because that will be in close so the 20.5 setback when
applied to that also.
>> Correct for just I didn't understand that.
The proposed addition, I wasn't sure of that structure for
staying up.
>> And the questions Gentlemen.
Thank you Sir for Egypt,
you have to speak in support of the applicant.
When you hear to speak in opposition.
Seeing none close in Florida.
What I can prove with a second.
All those in favor. All those opposed.
We are proven joy.
All right, let's move on to the U.S..
Actually I I've read them all and you know sweet the
challenge in motion.
What's your proof as is.
Second second second this favor.
Unanimous.
>> Anything there's 2 sets of minutes that view area and
March you're all right so he can we clarify which month that
was approved for and we've done but if I mean your motion to
include both.
>> I would like to amend my motion to include both sets of
minutes in the second and that all right.
Well this vote in favor. I think I those opposed earned
unanimous.
We are adjourned thank you thank you all.
What to watch that.